The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009)

Director:

Chris Weitz

Writers (WGA):

Melissa Rosenberg (screenplay)
Stephenie Meyer (novel)

Release Date:

20 November 2009 (USA)

Genre:

Drama | Fantasy | Horror | Romance | Thriller

Tagline:

The Next Chapter Begins

Plot:

After Bella recovers from the vampire attack that almost claimed her life, she looks to celebrate her birthday with Edward and his family...

Plot Keywords:

Vampire | Washington | Forks Washington | Werewolf | Nightmare

US Showtimes:

The Bridge: Cinema de lux

11:15am | 12:40pm | 1:40 | 2:10 | 3:35 | 4:35 | 5:05 | 6:30 | 7:30 | 8:00 | 9:25 | 10:25 | 11:15am | 2:10pm | 5:05 | 8:00 | 12:40 | 1:40 | 3:35 | 4:35 | 6:30 | 7:30 | 9:25 | 10:25

(personalize)

Cast

Kristen Stewart	...	Bella Swan
Christina Jastrzembska	...	Gran / Bella
Robert Pattinson	...	Edward Cullen
Billy Burke	...	Charlie Swan
Anna Kendrick	...	Jessica
Michael Welch	...	Mike
Justin Chon	...	Eric
Christian Serratos	...	Angela
Taylor Lautner	...	Jacob Black
Ashley Greene	...	Alice Cullen
Jackson Rathbone	...	Jasper Hale
Russell Roberts	...	Mr. Berty
Cam Gigandet	...	James
Michael Sheen	...	Aro
Jamie Campbell Bower	...	Caius

Also Known As:

New Moon (USA) (informal title)
The Twilight Saga: New Moon (USA) (promotional title)
Twilight 2 (USA) (informal title)
Twilight: New Moon (USA) (informal title)
Untitled Sports Movie (Canada: English title) (fake working title)

MPAA:

Rated PG-13 for some violence and action.

Runtime:

130 min

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital | DTS

Certification:

Japan:G | USA:PG-13 (certificate #45662) | Sweden:11 | Norway:11 | Ireland:12A | Switzerland:12 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:12 (canton of Vaud) | Singapore:PG | Philippines:G (MTRCB) | Thailand:G | Brazil:12 | Portugal:M/12 | South Korea:12 | Netherlands:12

Filming Locations:

David Thompson Secondary School, Victoria-Fraserview, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Company:

Imprint Entertainment

Trivia:

"New Moon" is actually Robert Pattinson's favorite book in the Twilight series.

Goofs:

Revealing mistakes: At the birthday party, when Dr. Cullen is stitching Bella up, they show a close up of a syringe with a type of liquid in it. Regardless of the type of liquid, in order to inject anything into the human body, the syringe must be free of air bubbles. The syringe clearly has a large bubble of air.

Quotes:

Charlie Swan: Look, Bella, I don't have to go fishing today.
Harry Clearwater: Yes, you do!

Movie Connections:

Featured in 2009 MTV Movie Awards (2009) (TV)

Soundtrack:

La Cathédrale engloutie

So BAD I find it funny

I've read all the books. I know what happens. This never ruins a film for me.

I didn't want to see this film because the previous one was lacking in... well... everything. But girlfriend wanted to see it. I went in and was instantly surprised to see the demographic had widened past 12-16 year old girls who instantly swoon at any even remotely hot guy so that was interesting. It's not relevant to how good the film was- it just reaffirmed to me (and should to all of you) that hating a series on principle or having preconceived notions of how bad something will be is unfair on it.

Not in this case. It was still bad. BUT worth the money I payed to see it because though it most definitely not intended to be entertaining in the way I found it. It was full of melodramatic dialogue and bad acting which, if you take ANY Drama classes at school- Which Robert DIDN'T- you'll notice certain things about how people deliver lines. You notice how they're SAYING lines they have memorised with unnatural and stylised emphasis on the key words in the sentences without giving the (cheesy) dialogue depth or realism. Quite simply, it was so terrible I found myself resisting the urge to burst out laughing in a room full of fans who were probably misinterpreting the melodrama as "Good, emotional drama." No. This film is ridiculous.

As it goes further on it gets less tightly stitched together and I had to become reliant on my knowledge of the books to fill in and pick up the slight gaps in dialogue and plot. They would say things that are based on something that didn't happen on screen (probably deleted scene for time) or their dialogue would just be terrible unrealistic lines that are work as standalone ones for a trailer but in conversation it seems like they're jumping slightly just to get to say something that is dramatic without it actually making too much sense.

BUT! It does have SOME redeeming qualities! The melodrama wasn't nonstop hilarity so thankfully something else held my attention. There was actual effort put into this film. The fight scenes actually used REAL special effects (something the first film was a bit cheap on) which actually looked kinda impressive. Any action was short lived unfortunately but what little there was, they did a reasonable job with.

I was impressed at the presence of transition. The previous film jumped and skipped and the next plot point just WAS without having been caused. This film (until near the end, of course) actually had a pace and a coherency to it that allows you to understand it without reading the books. This is a bonus. Certain things you'd think would drag on as the director tries to give you time to let the "emotion" "sink in" thankfully didn't take forever and the entire movie fit almost snuggly into its 2 hour length. Too bad it fell apart more and more it went along.

The film also shares the semi-awkward character interactions that create the same humour as the first one. Not as deliberately funny as the first one (though, as I said, it was pretty hilarious when it wasn't meant to be) though.

Though it was many failings with only a few things to back it up as being a reasonable film it will definitely make all you little teenage girls out there desperate to see Jacob's hell tanked up body very happy. You can HEAR the audience's reaction the first time Jacob takes his shirt off. He's got all you need: Pecs, biceps, ABS OF STEEL and minimal clothing. Too bad he lacks depth and real character. (Girls love obsessively devoted Zombies, they don't think enough to complain) It is NO WAY even NEAR one of the best films of 2009. NO ONE should say this ridiculous claim.

Really tossing up between 3 and 4 stars. Mmm. I guess a movie's highlight shouldn't be how low it sinks. 3.